Attachment Parenting / Bonding – Kindred Media https://www.kindredmedia.org Sharing the New Story of Childhood, Parenthood, and the Human Family Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:37:18 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.6 https://www.kindredmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/cropped-Kindred-Black-Logo-square-32x32.png Attachment Parenting / Bonding – Kindred Media https://www.kindredmedia.org 32 32 Brain-Based Parenting: A Podcast Book Review https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/09/brain-based-parenting-a-podcast-book-review/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/09/brain-based-parenting-a-podcast-book-review/#respond Sat, 12 Sep 2020 20:57:07 +0000 https://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=26603 The Evolved Nest · Brain – Based Parenting: A Book Review   Darcia Narvaez and Mary Tarsha review Brain-Based Parenting: The Neuroscience of Caregiving for Healthy Attachment Visit the www.EvolvedNest.org for more science and resources In this groundbreaking exploration of the brain mechanisms behind healthy caregiving, attachment specialist Daniel A. Hughes and veteran clinical psychologist […]]]>

 

Darcia Narvaez and Mary Tarsha review Brain-Based Parenting: The Neuroscience of Caregiving for Healthy Attachment

Visit the www.EvolvedNest.org for more science and resources

In this groundbreaking exploration of the brain mechanisms behind healthy caregiving, attachment specialist Daniel A. Hughes and veteran clinical psychologist Jonathan Baylin guide readers through the intricate web of neuronal processes, hormones, and chemicals that drive―and sometimes thwart―our caregiving impulses, uncovering the mysteries of the parental brain.

The biggest challenge to parents, Hughes and Baylin explain, is learning how to regulate emotions that arise―feeling them deeply and honestly while staying grounded and aware enough to preserve the parent–child relationship. Stress, which can lead to “blocked” or dysfunctional care, can impede our brain’s inherent caregiving processes and negatively impact our ability to do this. While the parent–child relationship can generate deep empathy and the intense motivation to care for our children, it can also trigger self-defensive feelings rooted in our early attachment relationships, and give rise to “unparental” impulses.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/09/brain-based-parenting-a-podcast-book-review/feed/ 0
The Hows and Whys of Attachment Parenting https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/08/the-hows-and-whys-of-attachment-parenting/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/08/the-hows-and-whys-of-attachment-parenting/#respond Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:03:41 +0000 https://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=26173 Empathic parenting is the heart of secure attachment and child thriving. Listen to the book review: Children are born expecting their needs to be met quickly, as in the womb—their bodies expect an external womb experience for the first 18 months or so because they are highly immature. Human babies look like fetuses of other […]]]>

Empathic parenting is the heart of secure attachment and child thriving.


Listen to the book review:


Children are born expecting their needs to be met quickly, as in the womb—their bodies expect an external womb experience for the first 18 months or so because they are highly immature. Human babies look like fetuses of other mammals till about that age. Ashley Montagu (1986) put it this way: Babies need a “womb with a view.” Thus, it is best to be tightly attuned to their needs during this period to ensure optimal normal development.

To be an attuned parent requires empathic concern for the well-being of the child, taking the child’s perspective—imagining how the child is feeling and moving to meet the need. This requires some understanding of how a baby’s brain and body are co-constructed by parental care. Understanding babies’ needs, the evolved nest, and how meeting those needs shapes a healthy cooperative child is a place to start. After the first few years, parents can take a step away, after the child has developed self-regulation and confidence, with their help. But in the first 18 months or longer, babies need 24/7 attention and quick calming so that their body systems learn from quick calming experiences to calm themselves in a similar manner. What babies practice is what they become.

What does empathic parenting look like in the first few years? Barbara Nicholson and Lysa Parker show us in their book, Attached at the Heart: Eight Proven Parenting Principles for Raising Connected and Compassionate Children. It’s a conversational compendium of research, stories, and personal accounts aimed at parents of young children, but its principles extend to the lifespan of the parent-child relationship.

Empathic parenting is what peaceful cultures provide where optimal child development is the norm. It may also help parents heal from their own childhood wounds, educating them about child needs and positive parenting, and guiding them in providing the support they themselves may not have received.

The overall approach is to encourage falling in love with the child, then to listen to the child and one’s instincts. “Ask yourself, Will this strengthen my connection with my baby?” (p. xxvi)

“Good parenting begins in your heart and then continues on a moment-to-moment basis by engaging your children when feelings run high, when they are sad, angry, or scared.”

They present eight principles for which they cover multiple subtopics and provide ample suggestions:

Prepare yourself for pregnancy, birth, and parenting. Choose your obstetrician, mother-friendly hospital and doula. Avoid unnecessary ultrasounds due to their effect on fetal development. Stay fit.

Feed with love and respect. They describe many benefits of breastfeeding for mother and baby, how breastfeeding mothers get more sleep and have less chance for depression. “Comfort nursing” means providing the breast when the child needs comforting. This is a standard form of comforting used in traditional societies around the world. They urge gentle weaning when the time comes, whether less than a year or more years.

Respond with sensitivity. Building a strong heart connection with baby requires parental empathy, represented by an attitude of “Your feelings matter to me. You can trust me. I will help you feel better.”

Use nurturing touch. The authors describe how touch is a critical aspect of a “womb with a view.” In our ancestral context, infants are held or carried by someone all the time (only half the time by mother). They discuss the benefits of babywearing and infant massage (one of which may be compliance with riding in a car seat!).

Ensure safe sleep, physically and emotionally. Mother-baby sleep research is discussed including how it is not normal (or good) for babies to sleep through the night or to sleep alone. Reviewing research, they point out that more babies die alone in cribs than die in the family bed. As Dr. James McKenna has studied, babies need mother nearby when sleeping because sometimes they stop breathing. There are safe ways to bedshare and it is vital to co-sleep (same room) with an infant. They offer gentle ways to help baby sleep, describe the research showing the detrimental practice of sleep training.

Provide consistent, loving care. Babies are establishing their sense of trust and their attachment style in the early years. Stressing babies too much undermines their development. It is vital to provide long term responsive relationships, not a “caregiver roulette.”

Practice positive discipline. They provide 25 tips for practicing positive discipline. One of the key tips is to understand what unmet need is behind the child’s annoying behavior. They review the research regarding the harms of corporal punishment—from increased aggression in childhood and adulthood, worse mental health, and becoming abusive toward others. Using spanking on children comes from a misunderstanding of child development and what brings about goodness.

Strive for balance in your personal and family life. Every parent needs to make sure that they are taking care of themselves so they can care for their children. One mother’s story they include is of a mother of twins who let go of her own secondary needs for the first three years, but then things got easier. Young children are an investment of loving attention that pays off in the long term.

This classic book is a wonderful parental companion that can be read a few pages at a time. Inspirational stories and research nurture the parent into an empathic embrace of her child. Mary Tarsha and I did a podcast (at the top of the page) reviewing the book comparing its recommendations to those of the evolved nest. One thing we recommended for their next edition is nature connection, but otherwise their principles are similar to those of the evolved nest. We gave the book two thumbs up.

References

Montagu, A. (1986). Touching: The human significance of the skin. New York: Harper & Row.

Nicholson, B., & Parker, L. (2013). Attached at the heart: Eight proven parenting principles for raising connected and compassionate children. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications, Inc.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/08/the-hows-and-whys-of-attachment-parenting/feed/ 0
How A Grassroots Vision Is Driving Scotland To Become An ACES Aware Nation https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/acesinscotland/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/acesinscotland/#respond Wed, 29 Jul 2020 19:06:29 +0000 https://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=26002 If Scotland Can Do It, Can America? An Interview with Suzanne Zeedyk, PhD The CDC-Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study is one of the largest investigations of childhood abuse and neglect and household challenges and later-life health and well-being. The 1995-1997 study linked childhood abuse directly to adult disease, showing definitively that as the […]]]>

If Scotland Can Do It, Can America?

An Interview with Suzanne Zeedyk, PhD

The ACE Pyramid represents the conceptual framework for the ACE Study. The ACE Study has uncovered how ACEs are strongly related to development of risk factors for disease, and well-being throughout the life course. Click on the image to learn more. Image from CDC website.

The CDC-Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study is one of the largest investigations of childhood abuse and neglect and household challenges and later-life health and well-being. The 1995-1997 study linked childhood abuse directly to adult disease, showing definitively that as the number of adverse childhood experiences increase, so do the risks for negative health and life outcomes.

While the United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have produced copious materials to help professionals, families and communities understand ACES, the United States remains mired in a Dominator Culture that, according to the Center for Partnership Studies, translates into:

  • The U.S. is the only developed nation with no national funding for paid parental leave.
  • The U.S. invests less than half as much in family benefits as other OECD nations: 1% of GDP compared to the OECD average of 2.6%.
  • The U.S. invests one third as much on environmental protection as the European Union average.
  • Among major developed nations, the U.S. invests the least in early childhood care and education.

Because Americans do not experience a wellbeing-oriented culture, it may be difficult for many of us to imagine how social supports through public policy creation could impact the country’s current devolution into a more authoritarian society. Even the CDC’s video We Can Prevent ACES focuses on recommendations like parent education and mentorship in communities, a microcosmic approach, instead of pointing to the macrocosm: missing social supports like healthcare, childcare, maternal care, and paid family leave enjoyed by every developed country in the world.

In this interview, Suzanne Zeedyk, a research scientist whose passion is to bring ACES science to the general public, shares how culture change is being driven by a grassroots vision to make the whole of Scotland an ACES aware nation. The country’s holistic approach to treating violence as a preventable disease led to a 50 percent reduction in violence in big cities like Glasgow over the past decade.  In this podcast we hear Dr. Zeedyk share her experience of working with police departments, childcare centers, schools, and hosting an ACES conference of over 2500 attendees in 2018. As a leading ACES advocate, she helped the country’s grassroots movement gain momentum with local premiers of the ACES film documentary, Resilience. As an America citizen and long-term resident of Scotland, Dr. Zeedyk shares her insights on the possibility of bringing this cultural transformation to the United States, where ACES awareness is finding new champions.

The Evolved Nest is a breakthrough concept that integrates findings across fields that bear on child development, child raising and adult behavior.  The Evolved Nest promotes optimal health and wellbeing, cooperation, and receptive and sociomoral intelligences. Societal moves away from providing the Evolved Nest have contributed to the ill being and dysregulation we see in one another and society. Learn how to nest your children and re-nest yourself.

In America, ACES Awareness is currently championed by California’s Surgeon General, Nadine Burke Harris, MD. You can see her TED Talk on ACES here and read about California’s efforts here. While America is beginning to recognize Adverse Childhood Experiences/childhood trauma as a risk factor and predictor of adult disease, the Evolved Nest Initiative helps us understand the neurobiological components and science-informed foundations of child flourishing and lifelong wellness. You can explore Darcia Narvaez’s award-winning research on our Evolved Nest here on Kindred.

It is possible, as Scotland’s success shows, for a nation to decide to become curious about the origins of violence, commit to the creation of a culture that supports wellness, and to share that success with other nations. For more on Scotland’s move toward a “wellbeing economy” watch First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon explain the far-reaching implications of prioritizing factors like equal pay, childcare, mental health and access to green space/nature connection. Sturgeon shows how this new focus could help build resolve to confront global challenges.

Scotland’s wellbeing perspective underlines the Scottish Government’s response to COVID.  The National Child Health Commissioners, a group overseen by Scottish Government, have called publicly for a “rights and value-based response” to COVID, explicitly drawing attention to the impact of COVID lockdown on children’s relationships and attachment experiences as a result of stresses under which families have been placed.

In an upcoming interview with Riane Eisler, founder of the Center for Partnership Studies, Kindred further explores the social structures needed for the United States to move toward a wellbeing culture, and how the current pandemic is shifting our focus in that direction. Eisler’s Social Wealth Economic Indicators, a path forward for the U.S., can be found here. In a July 7 2020 Forbes interview, Eisler briefly outlined her plan for economic transformation.

Dr. Zeedyk is a developmental psychologist and Honorary Fellow at the University of Dundee. She began her academic career with a doctorate from Yale University. She is the creator of the film and educational project, The Connected Baby, and the author of multiple books on the science of human connection. As she shares with us in this interview, it is her passion and mission to bring the science of connection to parents and professionals who “deserve to know” this information so that they can feel more confident in taking part in a conversation about human relationships, healing and wellbeing.


Read Kindred’s articles on Adverse Childhood Experiences

Take the Adverse Childhood Experiences Quiz

Kindred’s ACES and Trauma Resources

NEW: Start your own ACES Initiative in America

Visit Dr. Zeedyk’s Connected Baby resources.


Listen to the Interview


Explore Interview Topics


Scottish Police Embrace a Holistic View of Violence as a Virus and Attachment as an Antidote

What Happens When People Become Curious About The Origins Of Violence?

The Role of ACES in Violence Reduction

Discovering Resilience, the Documentary, and the Start of an ACES Grassroots Movement

ACES In Childcare and Education

How To Talk About ACES Without Shame or Guilt?


Read the Interview Transcript


Scottish Police Embrace a Holistic View of Violence as a Virus and Attachment as an Antidote


“…they began to see violence in a new way.  Rather than define it as a criminal justice issue they began to see it as a public health issue.  They began to talk about violence in a new way: that violence is a disease that you catch from the stress in relationships around you, and therefore if it’s a disease that you catch you can prevent it, and that the key time to prevent violence is in those early years…”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  It’s been 10 years since we talked about The Connected Baby, your film (the Kindred interview is here).  If you listen to this interview, what you will hear is Dr. Zeedyk telling me that she has been working with the local police department on understanding attachment and childhood and how it related to, relates to violence in Scotland.  Then, I couldn’t believe it.  Now, what has happened?  (See the video below) I couldn’t believe it back then, and now this holistic approach is responsible for a 50% drop in violence in Glasgow.  Adverse Childhood Experiences, ACES, we call it now, attachment back then.  So how did that happen?

DR. ZEEDYK:  It’s a brilliant story and I am so glad you have asked.  Let me embed that within my decision to step away from academia because I am a developmental psychologist.  I study infant development, why relationships matter for the whole of your life and how they shape you become, your experiences in that early time, and I loved being a basic research scientist and at the same time I got frustrated because I began to realize that I had access to information that I thought was really fascinating and important about how babies develop and the wider world really did not have access to those publications, to those discoveries, and I thought they deserved it.  

Human beings are wired in their brain and their bodies to form relationships, to expect other people.  Babies who are in the womb in the last three months of pregnancy they can hear their mother’s voice, and the voices of anyone else who is in their world on a daily basis, so their father’s voice, their grandma’s voice, their big sister’s voice.  I think that’s fascinating that you already know who’s going to be in your world.  You can hear that through the wall of the womb, and you can pick up whether they laugh a lot or sing a lot or whether they shout and cry a lot.  And your experiences of the tone of that voice and the rhythm of that voice and the hormones that will go with it.

I thought parents deserved to know, and social workers deserved to know, and childcare staff deserved to know, and police deserved to know, and politicians, and manufacturers of baby buggies, and I thought people deserved to know that stuff.  So, when I last spoke to you 10 years ago I was in the process of stepping away from full-time academia to what I do now, which is to work with the public and try to translate that science for them, and the core message of that science for me is that babies come into the work already connected to other people.  

For example, if your mother is producing stress hormones because she’s worried about life, because she’s in domestic violence, because her life is uncertain, she doesn’t have enough money, she lives in a violent neighborhood, she copes with racism.  Those would produce stress hormones.  If she was more relaxed and not scared she would have different types of what I call teddy bear hormones that help you to relax and feel comforted coursing through your body.


Watch Suzanne Zeedyk talk with Scotland’s Violence Reduction Unit about their insights into breaking intergenerational cycles of trauma, resulting in violence, through a holistic view of violence as a virus and the need for attachment for human mental and physical wellness.


Okay, by the time the baby is born the baby’s brain and body is already being wired, if that’s the right word, and some people don’t like that word so you think what word would you use to get across the idea that you are already born with an expectation of what your world will be like.  Who’s in it?  How stressful is it?  How predictable is it?  How scary is it?  How safe is it?  How much laughter will there be?  That’s already wired in your body.  I think that’s amazing.  I think it’s endlessly fascinating.  And then babies really tune into the way that other people respond to them and how they treat them and what that feels like, and that goes on to influence their biological development.

What I wanted to do was to help people understand that and to help us to think about what that means. So, when I spoke to you 10 years ago, I didn’t know if I would be able to feed myself even for the next year.  Of course, it’s 10 years on and it’s really celebratory, so what I can tell you now is that people want to know this stuff.  If you make science accessible to people they’re interested, they’re fascinated.  They want to think about what it means for their individual lives, for these children’s lives, for their communities, for themselves and the experiences they were having as a child.  

So, I’ve spent the last 10 years having good fun and lots of challenges to think how do you get and help people to think about those things.  It’s something like, I don’t know, it must be heading towards 100,000 people have come to live events.  Now, of course, we’re doing everything online; that lets more people come.  I now have a small team.  We produce resources that help people to get this and The Connected Baby was our very first one.  So, I had made a film which set out to communicate that basic message, which is that babies arrive already connected to other people.

Public policy makers, police, social workers, teachers, childcare staff, all those people that I thought might be interested turned out to be interested, but they need the science to be accessible to them and described in a way that feels relevant and that doesn’t feel scary with big words that don’t make sense, where they don’t feel patronized and in fact where they can be brave and curious, because some of that science requires some real courage to engage with because once you realize how much your behavior as a parent is having on your child that takes a bit of courage to get your head around. If we don’t pay attention to the tone that we talk about that in, then parents understandably shut down because it’s too scary to think about.  

LISA:  In the last 10 years we were talking on Kindred about connection and attachment and prenatal science and now we have ACES, which is taking off, at least in discussions here in the states.  This is important to know ACES isn’t the phrase used when watching your interview with the police. When did attachment discussions lead to ACES discussions?

DR. ZEEDYK:  Can I go back to the police and just start there for a moment, because it helps to make it really relevant?  Okay, so in 2004 in Scotland something unusual was happening.  There were a couple of key members of the police who worked in Glasgow and at that point Glasgow was seen as one of the most violent cities in Europe because we had a high number of deaths by stabbing.  In Scotland we don’t have… guns are not allowed to be owned by the general public, and so in America you have a lot of shootings and in the key parts of Scotland we had a lot of stabbings.  

A lot of that came from gang violence, but it was also intergenerational, so families where members had died or gone to prison, their children went to the same prison, their children went to the same prison and they were housed on the same street.  It was just generation after generation, and eventually these two key members of the police said, “You know what?  We’re just locking people up. We’re not reducing crime.  Couldn’t we do something different?  Is our role as the police to arrest the bad people and lock them up or is our role as the police to actually prevent crime and indeed prevent violence.  Violence in all its forms, not just criminal violence.”

That’s a really radical thought.  Their names are John Carnochan and Karen McCluskey and they convinced their boss to allow them to have some time to think about the violence problem in a new way and to start to talk to people that would give them ideas about what are other ways you could approach and prevent violence.

If they had not had the time to do that thinking and they had not had the support of their divisional commander, we wouldn’t be where we are in Scotland today. I pause to help us to think about the importance of leadership and the importance of curiosity and the importance of thinking outside the box.  

At that point I didn’t know about the Violence Reduction Unit.  I heard about their third-hand.  I thought it sounded like they were doing some really fascinating things.  They had begun to talk about the importance of early years, the idea that police were talking about babies.  I thought it was a great idea.  

I actually got approached to critique that idea, that police should not be doing that, and I disagreed and so I wrote to them and said,”I don’t know who you are but I just want you to know that I think that this is a really creative important idea that you’ve had.” So John and Karen called me and said, “Could we come and talk to you about child development?”  And therein started my support for the Violence Reduction Unit that has lasted to this day.  

I flagged that because that becomes important to coming back to what is happening now 15 years on.  But it’s worth thinking about, How do you get a police department that’s interested in babies?  They got really criticized for that.  People just said, that is not the roll of the police, and you know, that’s a fascinating question.  What is the role of the police and who decides what the role of the police is, and what happens if the police decide that their role is to try to prevent violence rather than just cope with its consequences?  

The route that they went down, they began to see violence in a new way.  Rather than define it as a criminal justice issue they began to see it as a public health issue.  They began to talk about violence in a new way: that violence is a disease that you catch from the stress in relationships around you, and therefore if it’s a disease that you catch you can prevent it, and that the key time to prevent violence is in those early years with predictable, warm relationships that feel safe and that will not wire young human beings for stress and anxiety, but that will wire them for internal safety so that you can handle things like uncertainty, anxiety.  You can trust people.  You can stay curious.  If you’re wired for anxiety, all of those things are harder.


What Happens When People Become Curious About The Origins Of Violence?


“…the crucial opening is people who are willing to get curious and to give up blame. And that’s part of what the Violence Reduction Unit was able to do.  They were able to help people to be more curious and the science of adverse childhood experiences and attachment are some of the things that helped them to do that.”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  So, if we had this mentality of providing the connection at the beginning, as a preventive measure to create wellness, this could change the population.  Is that what you saw?

DR. ZEEDYK:  Absolutely, that is where the thinking about understanding these key links and how relationships work on the body, that’s exactly where it takes you.  So you… what you start to realize is that cultures are shaped by the way parents raise their children, by the way parents are able to raise their children, because parents can’t raise their children on their own.  Parents raise their children in communities, so if you have communities that are really stressed, parents are stressed.  That’s inevitable.  That’s understandable, and if parents are stressed then children pick up on it and children become… their biology becomes tuned to stress because that’s how child development works.  

Read about Robin Grille’s new book, Inner Child Journeys.

You are in unconscious attunement to the people who are crucial in your life.  Robin Grille, who’s another Kindred contributor, talks a lot about that.  So, he in his fabulous book Parenting for a Peaceful World, I talk about that book a lot in the work I do. He talks about analyzing Nazi Germany, and he traces back the rise in Nazi Germany to the kind of advice that was given to lots of German parents in the period of time before the Nazi rise.  

In other words, why… how did Hitler gain power?  Why was he not just treated as talking crazy stuff?  Sometimes people talk about the economics of what was happening.  Sometimes people talk about the international relations at the time.  Well, Robin Grille talks about how children were raised and how your ability to tolerate uncertainty makes you susceptible to particular kind of messages and what Hitler promised was that he would save people from the enemy.  That was one of his messages.  

He created a “them” and an “us” and that he could protect you from the “them.”  So, if you’re wired for anxiety and you don’t even know that, it just feels like normal to you and a whole lot of other people in your community too, then it puts you at risk of people promising to bring you safety, but that bring with it all sorts of other consequences.  Robin Grille traces that kind of history when he talks about Nazi Germany and he traces that in a number of other cultures as well.  That’s a really big picture vision.  It speaks to me of just how important the way we care for our children is.

The police in Glasgow got interested in what kind of caring were lots of children in Glasgow getting.  What were their early childhoods like? And that became part of the new strategy that they brought to thinking about violence.  They thought in terms of gang membership as membership, as meeting the needs for relationship.  They thought in terms of purposeful lives, so if people don’t have jobs and they don’t feel part of the wider community, then human beings because of our attachment system which we’re biologically endowed with; we want to belong, so gangs are a good place to belong to.  

If you have stress in your early childhood that makes it hard to manage your emotions, if the people around you who are part of your tribe, a gang, are engaging in violence, well then that just comes to seem normal to you and so they began to ask lots of questions, fascinating questions, about what are the roles that human need for relationship is playing in the violence problem in Glasgow and to skip 10 years into the future through a variety of strategies but all embedded in understanding relationships and support and helping people to feel worthwhile and valued, they’ve cut the rate of violence in Glasgow by 50%.  

Watch the BBC show, with Kate Silverton, covering the reduction of violence in Scotland.

With all the costs in doing that, with reducing those with saving the sadness of human lives of people who are lost and the way the grief ripples out, they have really been able to make an impact on the violence in Glasgow. Just this week, there was a journalist who covered the history of the Violence Reduction Unit on national television here in the UK because she was trying to tell the story of how Scotland reduced violence because she’s hoping that the same types of insights might have an impact in London where the rates of youth violence and stabbing are very rapidly climbing.  Trying to help other people to get curious about how Scotland did that and began to see policing differently and violence differently, that’s one of her goals.  It’s an interesting challenge to try to help people to be willing to define violence through public health lands as a disease rather than just about what bad people do.

LISA:  This video that you just posted recently, is it 10 years old, the one where you talk about violence with crime unit heads.

DR. ZEEDYK:  Yeah.

LISA:  It’s a beautifully done video, by the way.  I found the most remarkable part is John Carnigan, and how he leads with curiosity, clearly as a seasoned investigator and police officer, and he says murders and suicides are not “happenstance.” They are not usually premeditated.  

When he becomes curious about what is it that’s going to predict violence?  What is contributing to this pattern?  And to hear him articulate the connection between childhood and the violence that they are trying to prevent – and this was a 10 year old interview – but it is completely relevant and remarkable to watch today.  

I felt like this is the crack.  This is the crack in the wall of resistance to a new worldview.  It has to be curiosity.  We have to breathe, pause, and allow something in ourselves to open up and make room for the possibility that there can be another way to approach violence.  That word that he uses is a very Scottish word: violence is not premeditated; it’s “happenstance.”

DR. ZEEDYK:  He absolutely does say that.  He and Karen, who is the other person interviewed in the film, and they are the cofounders of the Violence Reduction Unit, and as they would both say, it’s the Violence Reduction Unit.  It’s not the Violent Crime Reduction Unit, it’s the Violence Reduction Unit.  So, they are interested in domestic violence, racism, community violence, bullying, child abuse.  

They began to see the scope of what they were doing as about violence in much more broadly defined than just criminal violence, and that then allows them to see that if you go back to the gang warfare in Glasgow, they would describe it that it’s just as likely that you would be the young man ending up dead as you were the young man doing the killing.  It’s happening in particular communities, the communities that are stressed.  That doesn’t mean that the gang activity is happening in particular communities.  I think one of our problems is we can go, “Well, it’s those communities over there and if I’m safe in my community I don’t have to think about that community.” But part of the message that they were trying to say is that there is no them and us.  

What happens in one community ripples out to other communities, so for instance, taxpayers pay to put people in prison, right? Taxpayers pay for educational systems.  If children aren’t benefiting as fully as they might from those educational systems, the taxpayers’ money got wasted.  I suppose one response to that is, “Yeah, well, I don’t want to put my money into educating other people’s children.  I don’t want to put my money into childcare for other people’s children.  I’m perfectly happy to have people locked up in prison as long as my family is not at risk.”

So, we can respond to that in a fear-based way and move further and further and further apart so that we’re all living in our own little prisons because we’re scared of each other.  A society can absolutely get to that point.  You’re going to have to put a lot of money into protecting yourself from other people.  Your life is going to be much more restricted, in other words. And you can think of all sorts of ways in which a life based on fear looks like, or you can get curious about seeing new ways and making connections.  

I think of it this way.  If you just come back to the criminal justice issue, it turns out that children who live scary, stressed lives early in their childhood become wired for anxiety and that makes it harder for them to manage their emotions and manage their behavior.  So, prisons are full of people who lead traumatized childhoods.  I sometimes call prisons warehouses for traumatized people.  

LISA:  There’s a documentary out now based on ACES in prisons. (See the documentary trailer, Step Inside the Circle here.)

ACES in Prison: A New Documentary

DR. ZEEDYK:  Yes, there’s a documentary out for ACES and in fact there are a lots of people who have become interested in what happens with a traumatized childhood.  ACES, Adverse Childhood Experiences, is one of the latest ways to frame what happens with a childhood where you feel stressed and scared and you experience lots of trauma.  And I can come back to that in a minute if you like.  But it raises a very interesting question:  What happens if prisons are full with people who experience chaos and trauma when they were children.  How does that change our understanding of what the prison system is doing, what happened to have people get there, and are we willing to get curious about that or are we so attached to blame that we’re willing to pay more money for it, we’re willing to cause more misery for it.  How much are we willing to pay in order to stay attached to blame bad people?  

If we are willing to shift to a place of curiosity there are all sorts of other solutions that are possible that cost less money and that help people lead fulfilling lives.  For me, the crucial opening is people who are willing to get curious and to give up blame. And that’s part of what the Violence Reduction Unit was able to do.  They were able to help people to be more curious and the science of adverse childhood experiences and attachment are some of the things that helped them to do that.


The Role of ACES In Violence Reduction


“I see ACES as a continuation of the attachment work… We didn’t have an attachment movement.  I think that we have an ACES movement in Scotland because that film, Resilience, helped enough people to understand the science in a deeper way…”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  So, I want to go to a more thorough look at ACES, but before I do that I just want to tell our listeners that you can go to Kindredmedia.org and there is a trailer and you can go to links for the documentary on ACES in prison, which is called Step Inside the Circle.  It is a fairly new documentary.  

I would like to go back to the Adverse Childhood Experiences, ACES, survey that was done that is being used now as a tool to focus people’s attention in a very concise way on the connection between childhood and lifelong wellness or illness.  How’s that tool been fashioned and how’s it being used right now?

DR. ZEEDYK:  Let me go back to the science for a moment, in fact let me go way far back with the science. In the 1940s, scientists like John Bowlby and James Roberston, here in the UK, began to realize in deeper ways the importance of relationships, and that children were being shaped in really deep ways by the experiences of their mothers and their fathers and other people in their lives and that lead to what is often seen at attachment theory.  

Watch Vincent Felitti explain the study’s findings.

A lot of people did work on attachment theory for a number of decades, and that has an interesting history in and of itself.  And when I talked with you 10 years ago, I was talking a lot about attachment.  Adverse Childhood Experiences, the science framed that way, the first publication was done in 1998.  In other words it’s been around for about 20 years.  

I see ACES as a continuation of the attachment work.  That publication was done by two scientists, Vincent Felitti and Robert Anda, and the key insight that they had, that they were talking about and that they wanted a wider understanding of was that they had data that showed that if you had had stressful chaotic things happen in your childhood like domestic violence, a parent who was in prison, a parent with mental illness, a parent who used substances, parents who were divorced, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, that they could track with a correlational design an impact on adult health problems.  They were able to show a relationship between childhood trauma and heart disease, liver disease, diabetes, as well as alcohol addictions, drug addictions, as well as mental health difficulties like depression and mental health disorders.  They did that with a really big sample of 17,000 people so it was really robust and they published that in 1998.  Then a number of other studies have followed since then. 

Watch the Resilience trailer.

In 2014-ish James Redford, who’s a filmmaker, got frustrated because he knew about that study and he thought that the wider public should also know about that study.  And indeed we had been talking about that study in Scotland.  It was part of what the police department were talking about.  It was part of the way they explained how violence could carry on, but it was one of a kind of whole variety of pieces of scientific evidence that they were using to talk about.  

In 2014 James Redford begins to make the film that becomes the Resilence film where he’s talking about that science, and in 2017 we showed that film in Scotland. At the time we just saw it as a tool, as one more tool, for helping people to understand ACES and that study, but to understand the impact of relationships more generally.  What I had not predicted was the impact that that film was going to have.  It has a dramatic impact here in Scotland and people began to get in new ways the impact of relationships on childrens’ development and especially scary experiences.  

If you don’t have a reliable safe relationship in your life to help you with your scary experiences, then you become more wired for anxiety.  You become hypervigilant.  You have what I call a sabertooth tiger moment, i.e., you become wired for the fear of death at the extreme.  In other words, your body is wired for stress and worry and threat.  

How do you help people to understand that? Well, that film had a dramatic impact here in Scotland and what I learned from it was something really important.  You can have lots of science that is useful to people and that I think they would be fascinated by, but that very often the science does not leave the journals on it’s own.  I think we need to think more deeply about how you translate science for the wider public.  Because now there is an ACES movement, and that film has certainly helped here in Scotland and the UK and in parts of the US.  

We didn’t have an attachment movement.  I think that we have an ACES movement in Scotland because that film helped enough people to now understand the science in a deeper way and that has led to all sorts of other public responses and a tremendous amount of interest here in Scotland, and that film was the crucial thing that helped to gather momentum.  And so I think we need to think harder as scientists about how we translate key scientific discoveries.  We need to think about how we reach the public with those.

Discovering Resilience, the Documentary, and the Start of an ACES Grassroots Movement

“People belong to a nation.  We wanted a vision for what could our nation be like.  What kind of values do we want?  What do we want for its people?  What do we want for our children?  Our children!  In other words, it’s not them and us, it’s our children.”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  In the United States, Nadine Burke Harris, MD, who is now California’s Surgeon General, is trying to lead a movement of ACES awareness in that state, and she wrote the book The Deepest Well to try to help people understand ACES. She talks about one of the biggest hurdles she found is that she would present the science at conferences, and she said that no one was interested, that the participants in academic science, there were just crickets after her talks. Then she would go down to her table to pack up her books and get ready to leave and the people that were interested in her talk were the people who were working the conference, people who were waiting the tables, and putting together the event. These people came over to her and said, “I heard what you said and I want to know more about this.”  

I think in her mind, and certainly in mine as an activist for the last 22 years, the gatekeepers of science do not help average people understand the science. In my work, I have focused on ways around some of the institutions that seem to want to be gatekeepers for parents, who just want the information so they know what is the best course for their children and the best decision to make, and certainly how to create a culture that would be life-affirming and attachment-oriented.  But we don’t seem to get that information through the gatekeepers.

DR. ZEEDYK:  I think it all starts with curiosity.  So, I work with a lot of organizations myself.  So, I’ll work with anybody who wants to talk about what I call “this stuff” in order to help us, so it’s not so scary.  I think everyone deserves to know this stuff.  If I’m addressing an audience of nurses or I’m working with a school or I’m talking to doctors or to politicians, in my head I remember that in this audience there are mothers and fathers and grandparents and sisters and people who were once children, because if you get people interested at a personal level they listen to that information in a new way.  So, I never ever forget that I’m talking to individuals who have the capacity to be curious.  Then individuals bring their curiosity to organizations and to communities, and if you can help people to feel confident then they act on it.  That’s exactly what happened with our ACES movement here, is that when… let me just tell that story to help people to a vision or what happened.  

It was two tiny organizations that decided to show that film.  One of them was mine, Connected Baby, and another is an organization called Reattachment which worked with kinship carers and foster carers.  That organization was led by a woman named Tina Hendry.  Tina and I worked together and we knew the film was coming so we said to the UK distributors, could we show that film here in Scotland and they said sure.  We said it will be the first time, and we’ll call it the premiere.  The Scottish premiere, which it was.  

We gave it a big name and it becomes really interesting to go, what should you call it?  Should you call it a premiere?  Is that too big?  Well, it was and we wanted to celebrate it.  We only thought it was going to be one screening, so we put it up on social media. We booked a cinema, and I didn’t actually know that you could book a cinema at that point.  It turns out that you can.  You can rent the space like any other space.  We hoped that we would sell enough tickets to pay for that space.  We had no money and we just took a risk.  We thought it was important enough to bring to the wider public, we were willing to take a chance on it and it sold out.  

In a few days all the tickets were gone, which stunned us.  Then people began to write to us and say, “I couldn’t get a ticket to that screening and you’ve got no extra tickets.  Could you not bring that film to Edinburgh?” Which is another city here in Scotland, and we went, oh we hadn’t thought about that.  Well, okay I guess we could. So we booked another cinema and the tickets sold out and then people said, well could you bring that to Dunfermline?  Couldn’t you bring that to Inverness?  And before you knew it we found ourselves in the middle of all of this clamour to see that film.  

We had not anticipated it.  We were exhausted by the end of the summer; 2500 people came to see that film in 25 different locations in Scotland.  We ended up booking church halls, community centers.  One one occasion we showed it in a childcare center with people sitting on the floor.  

So, I’m trying to tell the story of a totally organic community movement and then the crucial bit was people went back to their organizations and said, you have to show this film.  They wrote to their local like city government and said you have to purchase this film.  You have to get a license for this film.  All the teachers who work in this city deserve to see that film, and they just badgered them.  We had no anticipation that that was going to happen.  Suddenly, that film was everywhere around Scotland.  People were following us on social media in England across the border said how can we get a hold of the film?.  People in Northern Ireland got in contact and said do you think we could do a screening like that?  

My little team at Connected Baby said, sure we’ll help you do the posters.  Before you know it there was just this explosion of interest and I tell that story a lot now because it helps to show there was no plan.  We had no money.  The government was not in charge of it.  Now, that’s an interesting point because here in Scotland the government, or local government, or national government is often seen as organizing these things.  So, lots of people assumed that the government would be in charge of it.  We did get the national public health organization to help us to distribute knowledge of it, and because they were putting work in their logo went on our poster, but they weren’t fronting it.  They didn’t put in money.  In other words it was entirely community led. 

 I tell that story because I hope it might inspire other people to think, okay we could do that.  Because that has happened in a number of places in America where people are talking about ACES and there are several key websites now, so ACES Connection is one of them, where people who come to understand, know about ACES, and want to talk to other people who are trying to do things are coming together.  I tell the story of what happened at a community level here in Scotland so that other people will know that it is possible.

Now in America, people are much more divided about what the role of government should be.  In fact if the government were doing this, some people will be highly suspicious of it, and people think that private organizations should be the sort of organizations that would fund this.  That’s a really interesting question.  If you have science that is useful to people, how do you get it out to the public.  Who funds that?  What happens if nobody funds it?  

How do you talk about debate around it, because we could come back to there’s some big debate around the ACES model now and there is some big debate here in Scotland.  Not everybody is in favor of that way of thinking of human experience and development.  What do you do if there’s a big debate if people aren’t trained in scientific methods?  How do you help them to get more confident and more curious?  

I have become really fascinated by that process of translating science for the public.  What is the story behind what happens?  I presume that at some point in the future, the story of how the film Resilience came to have such an impact on Scotland.  It might be forgotten.  People may have no memory that it was done by two little tiny organizations that had no money.  Those sorts of things can get lost in the detail, and yet knowing the story helps to inspire people who want to make change in the area.  Nadine Burke Harris called her book The Deepest Well.  Nadine Burke Harris is in that film, Resilience.  And in fact after that film tour with another organization here in Scotland that are called Tigers, and they work with young people to help them to find jobs, and I do work with them.  They’re run by a woman by the name of Pauline Scott, so I presume at some point she and her team might listen to this.  They also run a nursery called Lullaby Lane.  

So, Pauline and I were thinking about what are other ways that we could help people to think about ACES and relationships.  In other words not just the experiences that happen to children that are in the scoring system that ACES uses, but to actually think about relationships.  Not just the kinds of events.  That’s been really important here in Scotland, to keep relationships at the center of our thinking.  So we said, do you think Nadine Burke Harris would come?  Lots of people have seen her in the film.  She was good in the film.  Do you think if we emailed her she would come?  So, basically over a glass of wine we went, well we could email her.  I hope she’s listening to this.  We could email her and she’ll probably say no.  We’ll probably not get her.  She’ll probably have a team.  We haven’t got any money.  How would we pay for her?  Well, if you don’t email her we’ll never know.  She probably…give her a chance to say no.  

She didn’t say no.  Did you know, she and her team emailed us back and said okay she would come.  I will never forget the night that we got the email.  It was late at night.  I text Pauline and said, are you up? Are you up?  I have to give you this news. The vision that she was then able to bring…in other words she could bring a bigger vision for how she was talking about ACES, what she was trying to help people to do.  She wasn’t yet the Surgeon General in California then.  So, Pauline and I said, let’s have an event.  Do you suppose we could get 500 people to come? What kind of venue do you need to hire that has 500 people at it?  That’s a big venue in Scotland.  Before we were done 2500 people came.

LISA:  I just find that so awesome, remarkable.

DR. ZEEDYK:  So the idea that there are 2500 people together in a big room wanting to talk about childhood trauma and the importance of relationships was massive. It wasn’t led by a multinational corporation with lots of money.  It wasn’t led by the government.  It was led by two small organizations who took a risk and who said I think we can do this if we thought creatively, and luckily we could just keep booking more tiers of seeds, otherwise we would have had to cap it.  So, luckily we had a big enough venue that let all those people come.  People would not have come to see Nadine Burke Harris if they hadn’t seen the film because they wouldn’t have known who she was.

LISA:  Yeah, okay.  Wow.

DR. ZEEDYK:  Okay, and then we developed…we began to develop a vision.  We began to talk about could we be the first ACE aware nation in the world?  Could we reach every single citizen of Scotland.  There are five million.  Now by American standards that sounds crazy.  There are lots of cities that are bigger than five million people, how can you have a whole nation with only five million people?  Well, you know what?  That was part of our strength we thought.  Could we, in other words, we talked about a nation, Lisa.  People belong to a nation.  We wanted a vision for what could our nation be like.  What kind of values do we want?  What do we want for its people?  What do we want for our children?  Our children!  In other words, it’s not them and us, it’s our children. 

So we began to put the science of ACES into a bigger vision that was about belonging rather than simply disperse information about trauma, we were trying to use it to envision about who we wanted to be and to have big conversations about that.  That energy still continues.  There are people who think, should we be doing more?  Who should lead that?  Is it going fast enough?  What if people disagree?  All of those are important questions.  Some people are uncomfortable about the debate, so here’s where some of the debate lies.  

Should we be scoring trauma on a 10 point scale.  That is how Felitti and Anda developed their original ACES methodology.  Nadine Burke Harris has developed a particular kind of screening tool that she uses with pediatricians.  She has a view that she has developed over time in trying to make use of an ACES frame in the way that she thinks about health and the way that she thinks about violence in neighborhoods and the way that she thinks about racism, and the vision that she has for the change that could happen in California.  We were not having those kinds of big discussions in Scotland before the ACES frame came along.  So, although some people really do not like that scoring, some people really do not like that the first original publication by Felitti and Anda in 1998 was with a middle class sample.  They think that it should have been more representative with a more diverse class/classes and more diverse ethnic makeup.  Now you can have very interesting discussions about what are the limitations of a particular design that still make the findings that it produces worthwhile and valuable.  

The key point for me is whatever debate one wants to bring to ACES, we were not having a public discussion about childhood trauma before the ACES frame came along.  So, there is something valuable about the ACES frame that helps people to step in and become more curious.  

I am grateful every day now for that debate, because I think children have a right to have safe, reliable relationships.  I think they have a right to expect adults who are curious about their emotional needs.  I think we have a moral responsibility as adults to offer that to our children, and I hope that the science helps more adults to get curious about that as well.  

We pay terrible prices when children in our communities experience uncertainty and fear and chaos and if families struggle, for whatever reason, to meet the needs of their children, then schools can step in and do a lot as well. So, there are full ripples if you understand the key idea that scary childhoods change your biology and that has consequences for the people around you.


ACES In Childcare and Education


“Evolutionarily, the evolution and history of the human species, children hung out with their tribe, with their extended family.  So from a child’s perspective, childcare staff are part of their extended family.  They are Aunty Mary and Uncle Jason, Grandma Molly, and so if they come to feel, if they come to love that person, if they come to like their company and miss them, if you move them to a new childcare setting and they never see those people again, that’s a bereavement.”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  I want to tell the listeners that we have the Find Your Score – ACES quiz on Kindred as well.  It is one of our most popular pieces on the website.  In fact every time I tag something as ACES people go right to it.  Evidence that people are finding out about it and they’re very curious.  

But, before we go away from the how are ACES and this piece playing out in Scotland, I did want you to touch really quickly on childcare and schools because I have seen your presentations on YouTube, where you’re speaking to an audience of childcare providers, and I absolutely adore and deeply appreciate the way you present, because you’re very courageous saying, “To not be aware of attachment science is to cause damage.”

You just put it out there:  “You’re not going to like this.”  You’re reading the audience while you’re saying this, “Some of you are shaking your heads.”  You’re very aware of their response to what you’re bringing.  The part that I found to be remarkable and just heartwarming is you explain the point of view of the child and that going into a childcare facility if you told the child these people are being paid to care for you they would be appalled.  No, they love me and I love them, they believe. And to have a policy that says you have to move the child around and then you break relationships all the time unaware of the importance of this childcare provider, what significance they have in this child’s mind, and the impact of that on their biology and lifelong potentially, to just have that kind of disruptive policy and pattern in place.

DR. ZEEDYK:  Yeah, I do put it that way.  If you state things in strong ways, edgy ways, people pay closer attention to what you just said because they’re uncomfortable about it.  The tricky line is to try to say it in a way that helps them to pay attention without tipping them into guilt or shame.  Anger is even better than guilt or shame.  

So, how do you help us to think more deeply about the importance of relationships?  There are tons of people who are trying to get out this information.  Other names are Bruce Perry, Dan Seigel, Dan Hughes.  I have already talked about Bowlby.  There are lots of people… Darcia Narvaez.  I could name lots of people who have tried to help the wider public to try to understand the importance of relationships.  But clearly there’s a struggle, because some of the things I state are still a surprise to people, like childcare.  

In America, childcare is not funded by the government, and maternity leave is not even funded.  It’s not a federal requirement.  Okay, that must mean that either we don’t understand how important those early years are or we just haven’t heard the science of that, or that we don’t really get how important they are or actually we don’t care, the people in power don’t care or don’t really get it.

Here in Scotland we have maternity leave that’s funded by the government.  We have childcare that’s funded by the government.  In fact we just expanded the childcare provision here in Scotland over the last few years so that you… for children between three and four especially, have 1140 hours of government paid childcare a year. The government pays for that.  

Although there is some debate about that, one of the things it does is it helps parents in terms of employment.  Some people think that actually we should be using that money in other ways to support parents to stay home with their children,  and that’s another debate.  

But the question that you’re asking is, okay so children, including babies, are cared for by people that we call childcare staff.  If children come to love those staff, and children are wired to love the adults that they spend time with, they’re wired to do that biologically.  They don’t know that they’re paid to take care of you.  They would be appalled if they knew that.  Young children think that you’re there because you love them. Otherwise biologically they don’t know why you would be there.

Evolutionarily, the evolution and history of the human species, children hung out with their tribe, with their extended family.  So from a child’s perspective, childcare staff are part of their extended family.  They are Aunty Mary and Uncle Jason, Grandma Molly, and so if they come to feel, if they come to love that person, if they come to like their company and miss them, if you move them to a new childcare setting and they never see those people again, that’s a bereavement.  

Now if we were in a room together, I would say the word bereavement and then I would said for everybody to take in a breath because it’s scary, so I would say it in a very soft voice because it’s going to be hard enough to get your head around that because there’s going to be parents in the audience who suddenly see the implication of the fact that they moved their child’s childcare without ever thinking about that.  They’re suddenly thinking, would I have done that if I had heard her say that before?  Then people are going to have to decide how they feel about what I just said.  Some people might get angry.  Some people might go to a place of guilt.  What I want to do is help us to get curious.

So, let me move to the last few months.  Here in Scotland we went into lockdown because of COVID.  So almost overnight childcare settings closed down.  Schools closed down.  So, children went home to be with their families and they missed their childcare workers and staff and because we call them workers and staff we grownups think of them as employed to do this.  We don’t think of it through the child’s view.  

Some nurseries who really got this attachment view under their belt worked hard to stay attached to those children and connection with those children.  They sent videos.  They sent letters.  They put on videos of the songs that they sang. They took videos of the toys that they had been playing with.  They took videos of the children in their garden.  They sent keyrings home with pictures of their key staff.  

Spontaneously, the children of those parents began to send back videos of the children responding to the videos, to the keyrings, to the letters.  So one of the things that has happened here in Scotland… and some of those were put on social media.  People have been able to see, even babies, you know 10-month-olds, children who are not talking yet, light up at the sound of that person’s voice, get really close to the screen with the video of that person, so you start to see the connection that’s there that lots of people might assume, well the children won’t remember because we can’t remember consciously as adults back to those early times so we have this idea that children forget. Children don’t forget.  


One of the phrases that often gets used a lot in the trauma world is that the body keeps the score, meaning that the body remembers what you don’t always remember consciously.  If we coped with a lot of grief and a lot of uncertainty because we ended up at several different childcare settings when we were young, that will have left traces on our bodies in ways that our parents never meant to.  In ways that the childcare staff never meant to.  

If you’re setting up these children to cry a lot, and there’s lots of people who think that if we just ignore children’s crying they’ll learn to not cry, children cry because they are trying to express that they need something.  So, if the childcare staff ratio is too high to attend to the needs of those children, then those experiences are shaping children’s attachment experiences in the same way that they would be experienced at home.  

Being able to think about the importance of those early years and the importance of the kind of care that we provide in those early years, it really really matters. If you haven’t got the idea that those early experiences are going to change you biologically, people just don’t even know to get started with those kinds of questions.


How To Talk About ACES Without Shame or Guilt?


“Rather than telling people how to parent, which pisses a lot of people off, what I try to do is to help us to understand how children and babies develop so that we can get curious about what they need rather than to be told how to parent them.  So that’s the approach that I try to come at this, and what I find is that if people don’t feel shamed, bossed, pressured, they step in with curiosity.  In my experience people really want to know this stuff.”

SUZANNE ZEEDYK, PHD

LISA:  I want to segway here into how do you appeal to adults?  Because families who try to do attachment parenting in America are considered counter-culture, and there are a number of organizations I have worked with over the years who have developed community groups and support groups and gathering groups for parents who are interested in attachment, but even parents who are interested, when I would go present to them, you could see that the language… I would have to be careful about the language because of the guilt and shame and fear that is so ready here in American society to pounce on parents and really pummel them.  I appreciate that you have the Tigers and Teddies program, which I would like to hear you explain how that kind of goes in the side door and skips all the shame and fear, and then I would love to hear about your book as well, The Little Iceberg.

DR. ZEEDYK:  Okay those are great questions.  If you come back to how do you talk about this stuff in a way that doesn’t make people feel guilty and ashamed and pressured but helps them to be curious.  I often use metaphors because it helps people to get ideas, and I found myself trying to talk about what it’s like to feel comforted and safe and I found myself talking about the experience that you have with a teddy bear, they are like teddy bear moments when you feel safe and relaxed and comfortable and when you get scared and you feel threatened it’s like the saber tooth tiger were chasing you.  

I pulled saber tooth tiger out of the air in those early days because it’s easy to imagine the great big teeth.  I now talk about saber tooth tigers and teddy bears all the time as a metaphor for helping us to think about the experiences of threat and of safety.  That metaphoric language helps to get it immediately.  There is no other purpose in a teddy bear than to help you to feel safe and comforted.  But it actually helps us to think about real teddy bears.  

Real teddy bears matter to children because they help them to feel safe.  So lots of children want to take teddy bears with them to childcare.  What happens if you don’t know that those teddy bears are really important and you just see it as an object ,and you say something like, we don’t want you to lose your teddy bear so we’re going to leave it here in your basket at the door, and you don’t know that actually having the teddy bear with you, under your arm so that you can feel the fur, so that you can feel the warmth, all that sensory familiarity is part of what helps you feel safe and helps you to learn at childcare or helps you to make friends at childcare, that helps you to feel confident in the world.  

Teddy bears do that for young children.  I want to use teddy bear language as a metaphor for what is feels like internally but also to help us to think in light and yet serious ways about what are the ways that children feel safe, and teddy bears is one of those.  So when children have that meltdown… okay, my nine-month old was perfectly happy, I left them in the hall, I just wanted to go to the bathroom and they were playing with all their blocks and they were fine and I shut the door and they started screaming at me, mommy, mommy, mommy, mommy.  All I wanted to do was go to the bathroom.  It’s what I call a saber tooth tiger moment.  

From an adult perspective you think, why is the kid screaming at me?  If you feel totally beleaguered by your child screaming at you when you come out of the bathroom if you speak sharply to that child because you feel overwhelmed… it’s totally understandable… raising kids is hard.  But if you speak sharply every time you come out of the bathroom, the child starts to expect the reunions with you will be full of anxiety and they become wired for that.  They grow into that biologically. They get anxious about their reunion with you and that starts to shape their attachment style.

How do you help parents to get curious about why their child is crying when it makes no sense to you, especially if you feel accused by the child or you feel irritated by the child, or actually you are quite happy to pick up your child and rock your child and you don’t understand why the other parents aren’t? All of those are saber tooth tiger moments.  

Any emotions that are difficult for us I think of saber tooth tiger moments, and that’s because they’re drawing on the part of the stress system in the human body that are there to help you to deal with difficult moments.  At the extreme end that would be running away from a saber tooth tiger.  At a less extreme end that might be sitting at traffic lights.  You know, sitting at traffic lights doesn’t cause everybody stress but it causes some people stress because then they go into road rage.  So managing your emotional system is part of stress.  People often don’t think of emotions as part of our stress system.  Yet, when you stop to think about it that’s exactly what they are.  If you have experiences that wire your body for saber tooth tiger moments, then you find it harder to regulate your emotions.  That comes out in your behavior.  Attachment experiences shape that emotional system.  

Once upon a time, attachment scientists saw attachment in a cognitive way.  It was about your expectations of relationships, your cognitive working model, or they saw it was about behavior.  Nowadays, attachment scientists see attachment as about the emotional regulatory system. So that’s where it starts to overlaps with ACES.  If you have experiences of adults that are predictable and safe, then it wires you biologically different than if they are chaotic.  

What I try to do is to find ways to help people to think about that in a curious way rather than in an accused way.  So we just this summer released the second edition of my book called, Saber Tooth Tigers and Teddy Bears, the Connected Baby Guide to Attachment.  It’s purposely written in an extremely accessible style.  It’s not a big fat book.  It’s got lots of photographs in it so that it makes these ideas accessible to anybody and I now have people who write and say, “Your book changed my life because I can now see my own childhood in a different way. Your book has made me rethink my mother’s childhood really deeply in a way I never thought about.”

This makes me think about how we could bring this information to schools or to police or to criminal justice. So what I’ve tried to do is to make those ideas really accessible to everyday life.  In it I tell stories.  I think that’s my favorite part of it.  I tell stories of real people who put this information to use.  So I tell the story of a lawyer that understanding attachment and ACES changed the way that he argues the case for people who are accused of crimes.  He’s changed the way that he presents those cases to judges.  He talks more about the trauma in their childhood. 

The storybook comes with a Companion Guide that makes sure you don’t miss the clues as to how you can children struggling with sadness or trauma.

I tell the story of a bankrobber.  I tell the story of the schools who spent part of their school budget on purchasing lots of teddy bears so that the teddy bears are there when the children walk through the door because they know that many of those children will have left chaotic households that morning.  I tell the story of a parent who said I didn’t use to know this and now I’m better able to support my child who’s really anxious and I probably helped to cause some of her anxiety.  I didn’t mean to and I didn’t know that now, but I can forgive myself for what I didn’t know and I can get curious about how to help her now.  

Rather than telling people how to parent, which pisses a lot of people off, what I try to do is to help us to understand how children and babies develop so that we can get curious about what they need rather than to be told how to parent them.  So that’s the approach that I try to come at this, and what I find is that if people don’t feel shamed, bossed, pressured, they step in with curiosity.  In my experience people really want to know this stuff, and metaphors like saber tooth tigers and teddy bears give us a light way of engaging with those questions.

LISA:  That is a fantastic tool, and I am so very happy to hear about it and as you were saying the parenting piece is so tricky because of the prescriptive nature of it.  We have a lot of those in the United States that don’t look at the attachment science. I think it’s exactly what you said about what happened in Germany when you had the authoritarian style parenting in place and then you have a dictator come into power and people who follow him and you’re wondering how could this happen? But one preceded the other.  

This piece that you’re bringing in, giving parents tools to be present in a way that they want to be present and curious is just remarkable.  I know we’re about at the end of our time, but I did want to talk just for a moment about your The Little Iceberg book because it is also a glorious book and tool.  It’s not just a children’s book.  It is also a metaphor and it comes with a little book on the side that tells you what’s really going on in the children’s book so the parent or the educator, childcare professional can have this guide for themselves.  I said it gives your intelligence something and then also your intellect, both.  So tell us about The Little Iceberg.  

DR. ZEEDYK:  It all goes back to this question of how do you help people to know this.  One of the things I haven’t stressed is that there are no perfect parents.  There are no perfect families.  You don’t have to get it right all the time.  It’s one of the reasons I talk about the power of making up.  So it helps people to relax.  

So, we’ve got more and more excited on my little team about what kind of resources could we produce that would help people to get this.  So we’ve begun to work with other authors and other people who are talking about this wider, wider questions about trauma and relationships with lots of sectors like schools and police and politicians. Okay, how do we do that broadly?  

So, the other book we brought out this summer is absolutely The Little Iceberg and it’s written by a head teacher.  It’s a story that he wrote for the children in his school.  I had done some work with his school, and he began to say I’ve got this story, I wonder how I could get it published and before you know it, I had said my team could publish that for you.  

We held a competition and found a children’s book illustrator and this summer we released what was an 18-month project of a metaphoric story of a child who is lonely, traumatize, disconnected, scared.  That could be a foster child.  It could be a child who’s living in a family who doesn’t feel like they can talk to other members of that family and who’s scared and doesn’t feel connected.  

If you just think of children in all the different ways that the might be disconnected.  The Little Iceberg is floating a wide open ocean and is scared to be connected, to talk to, to make friends with any of the other creatures in that ocean.  And she’s well protected because she’s covered in all that ice, but if she stays with all the ice covering her she will not know the joy of connection.  

So the story is the story of a little bird who comes and helps and chips away at that ice.  A little bird against a big iceberg, and if that little bird, a friend, a new person, a stable relationship who can stick with it even when the iceberg basically says go away, I didn’t ask for you to land on me.  It’s the story of how the ice drops off and she melts and becomes part of the ocean around her.  

So the metaphor helps us to get the power of connection and how we can help.  So the story itself is full of all sorts of things you can do to help children who feel disconnected, but just to be sure that people were able to pick up on all of those details, we published it with a guide called Making Sense of Trauma which helps you to see the deeper meaning on all those pages.  

What we have found is that lots of schools are purchasing that book, some of them for every single classroom in their school, especially now as we come out of COVID lockdown because there are lots of children who will have experienced very uncertain chaotic times in households.  We don’t actually know what’s happening for a lot of families during this time, and that book will give a way for teachers to talk with children about what is happening with them, but to do it through a story rather than perhaps talking about their direct experience.  

My favorite… we sent the book to have reviews basically from lots of different kinds of people, my favorite review was from a little boy who’s 9-years-old who is named Callum who read the book and said, his favorite bit at the end was when the rainbow comes out because things are bright now for the little iceberg, and that’s not giving away the end of the story.  He said because of that, “I rate this book infinity out of infinity.”  So, I decided if that’s what a nine-year-old thinks, he’s a really good reviewer.  

LISA:  That’s very good.  Infinity out of infinity.  Well, we have so much to catch up on and I am so grateful that our listeners, hopefully you have stuck with us through this marathon interview and talk with Suzanne Zeedyk.  Suzanne, tell us where we can go to find some of these resources.

DR. ZEEDYK:  They’re all on our website, and that’s the Connected Baby website, so that’s www.connectedbaby.net . So Connected Baby is an organization I founded with my team in order to produce resources.  We host events and we stage exhibitions, and in fact we are now working on collecting photographs of reunions after COVID to stage an exhibition called Stories of Reconnection, because reconnection highlights the importance of reunions which was a key message of attachment.  

So you can find all of the resources on our website on the resources page and see what else we do.  We have a discussion about the science that underpins that, and we are in the process of developing a whole range of resources so if you keep checking back you’re likely to find new things there.  We wanted to make this available so it reached well beyond the borders of Scotland, and we have lots of people now from the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, America, Canada who regularly turn up on our site and we welcome everybody, and it’s why it’s really exciting to be talking to you again, Lisa.  It kind of feels like a full circle.

LISA:  Oh, it is.  It’s just remarkable and I can’t believe it’s been 10 years, but okay.  We’re here for the long haul anyway.  Thank you so, so much.  I look forward to having you back to Kindred. And if you are listening to this call you can find a transcript of our call at kindredmedia.org along with some other resources there for ACES and attachment and the new story of childhood, parenthood and the human family. What do you call it Suzanne?  The new story of childhood, parenthood, and the human family?

DR. ZEEDYK:  I often think of it as the science of human connection, and it begins in babyhood and it carries all the way throughout our lives.  There’s even now science that tells us that the symptoms that you exhibit in dementia can be traced back to your attachment style in your first year of life.  There is so much for us to know that people don’t know.  I think they deserve to.

DR. ZEEDYK:  Thank you for having me, Lisa.

LISA:  Well, thank you for being here to share with us the science and making it accessible to us.


RESOURCES

Read Kindred’s articles on Adverse Childhood Experiences

Take the Adverse Childhood Experiences Quiz

Kindred’s ACES and Trauma Resources

NEW: Start your own ACES Initiative in America

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/acesinscotland/feed/ 0
Natives Foster Happy People Without Overthinking https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/natives-foster-happy-people-without-overthinking/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/natives-foster-happy-people-without-overthinking/#respond Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:32:49 +0000 https://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=26045 In 1975, Jean Liedloff shocked Americans with her book, The Continuum Concept: In Search of Happiness Lost. She reflected on her multiple stays in the Amazon living with the Tauripan, Yequana, and Sanema peoples, who were healthy and happy beyond her imaginings. She was amazed at the differences in child-raising between the US and these “primitive” people. They were […]]]>

In 1975, Jean Liedloff shocked Americans with her book, The Continuum Concept: In Search of Happiness Lost. She reflected on her multiple stays in the Amazon living with the Tauripan, Yequana, and Sanema peoples, who were healthy and happy beyond her imaginings.

She was amazed at the differences in child-raising between the US and these “primitive” people. They were far from primitive but intuitively loving towards their children, raising intelligent and healthy adults.

She suggested that U.S. child-raising practices were undernourishing or even destructive, with the results that U.S. babies were very unpleasant, unwelcome in workplaces and parties:

“They usually shriek and kick, wave their arms and stiffen their bodies, so that one needs two hands, and a lot of attention, to keep them under control.” (p. x)

Liedloff noted that it was easy to tell the difference between babies who were physically “in arms” for much of a 24-hour day and those who were not. The former had flexible body tone and the latter “felt like pokers” (p. x).

She advocated taking (well-nurtured) babies to work instead of isolating mothers and children in their homes:

“We need to recognize that, by treating babies the way we did for hundreds of thousands of years, we can be assured of calm, soft, undemanding little creatures. Only then can working mothers, unwilling to be bored and isolated all day with no adult companionship, rid themselves of their cruel conflict. Babies taken to work are where they need to be—with their mothers; and the mothers are where they need to be—with their peers, not doing baby care but something worthy of intelligent adults.” (pp. x-xi)

Babies expect to be embedded in an active living community, not the center of attention but an observer.

The Evolved Nest is a breakthrough concept that integrates findings across fields that bear on child development, child raising and adult behavior.  The Evolved Nest promotes optimal health and wellbeing, cooperation, and receptive and sociomoral intelligences. Societal moves away from providing the Evolved Nest have contributed to the ill being and dysregulation we see in one another and society. Learn how to nest your children and re-nest yourself.

“A baby’s expectation is to be in the midst of an active person’s life, in constant physical contact, witnessing the kinds of experience he will have later in life. His role while in arms is passive, with all his sense observant. He enjoys occasional direct attention, kisses, tickles, being thrown in the air, and so on. But his main business is to absorb the actions, interactions and surroundings of his caretaker, adult or child. This information prepares him to take his place among his people by helping him to understand what they do. To thwart this powerful urge—by looking inquiringly, so to speak, at a baby who is looking inquiringly at you—creates profound frustration; it manacles his mind. The baby’s expectation of a strong, busy, central figure, to whom he can be peripheral, is undermined by an emotionally needy, servile person who is seeking his acceptance or approval. The baby will increasingly signal, but it will not be for more attention. It is actually a demand for the appropriate kind of experience.  Much of his frustration is due to his inability to make his signals (that things are wrong) bring about anything right.” (p. xiv)

Over her multiple visits to the Amazon, Liedloff reflected on what felt right or wrong — for a baby and for herself. For a baby carried virtually 24/7:

“The feeling appropriate to an infant in arms is his feeling of rightness, or essential goodness. The only positive identity he can know, being the animal he is, is based on the premise that he is right, good, and welcome. Without that conviction, a human being of any age is crippled by a lack of confidence, a full sense of self, of spontaneity, of grace. All babies are good, but can know it themselves only by reflection, by the way they are treated … Without the sense of being right, one has no sense of how much one ought to claim of comfort, security, help, companionship, love, friendship, things, pleasure or joy. A person without this sense often feels there is an empty space where he ought to be.” (p. 34)

Liedloff felt that she and her fellow Americans were crippled in this way, having never developed a sense of innate goodness. Instead of finding rightness in herself, she needed outside reassurance that she was worthy, but this could only be superficial.

“Ever more frequently our innate sense of what is best for us is short-circuited by suspicion while the intellect, which has never known much about our real needs, decides what to do. It is not, for example, the province of the reasoning faculty to decide how a baby ought to be treated. We have had exquisitely precise instincts, expert in every detail for child care, since long before we became anything resembling Homo sapiens. But we have conspired to baffle this long-standing knowledge so utterly that we now employ researchers full time to puzzle out how we should behave toward children, one another and ourselves. It is no secret that the experts have not “discovered” how to live satisfactorily, but the more they fail, the more they attempt to bring the problems under the sole influence of reason and disallow what reason cannot understand or control.” (pp. 21-22)

We’ve moved so far away from following instinct and shaping intuition about what is good for a baby, for the self, that we create problems we think can be resolved by experimental research. She argues that if we provide babies with what they need, as part of the human species, they will develop health and happiness. She describes how the newborn expects the species’ developmental niche or evolved nest to fulfill basic needs.

“Fresh from the series of expectations and their fulfillment in the womb, the newborn infant is expectant, or, more accurately, certain, that his next requirements will also be met … his place in arms is the expected place, know to his inmost sense as his place, and what he experiences while he is in arms is acceptable to his continuum, fulfills his current needs and contributes correctly to his development.

Again, the quality of his awareness is very different from what it will become. He cannot qualify his impression of how things are. Either they are right or not right. Requirements are strict at this early date. As we have seen, he cannot hope, if he is uncomfortable now, that he will be comfortable later. He cannot feel that “mother will be right back” when she leaves him; the world has suddenly gone wrong. Conditions are intolerable. … nothing in his evolving ancestors’ experience has prepared him to be left alone, asleep or awake, and even less to be left alone to cry.” (pp. 33-34)

The book is still shocking to read because of the contrast to most U.S. babies’ experiences. Recently, neurobiological sciences are providing empirical evidence for some of Liedloff’s insights and the importance of evolved, nested early experience (e.g., Narvaez, Braungart-Rieker, Miller-Graff, Gettler & Hastings, 2016; Narvaez, Pankepp, Schore & Gleason, 2013; Narvaez, Valentino, Fuentes, McKenna & Gray, 2014). In the podcast below, Mary Tarsha and I give it a thumbs up in terms of meeting Evolved Nestcomponents.

References

Find out more about The Evolved Nest, and how to bring home our species’ need for raising nested children to create compassionate adults.

Liedloff, J. (1977). The continuum concept: In search of happiness lost. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Narvaez, D., Braungart-Rieker, J., Miller, L. Gettler, L., & Hastings, P. (Eds.) (2016). Contexts for Young Child Flourishing: Evolution, Family and Society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Narvaez, D., Panksepp, J., Schore, A., & Gleason, T. (Eds.) (2013). Evolution, Early Experience and Human Development: From Research to Practice and Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Narvaez, D., Valentino, K., Fuentes, A., McKenna, J., & Gray, P. (Eds.) (2014). Ancestral landscapes in human evolution: Culture, childrearing and social wellbeing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/07/natives-foster-happy-people-without-overthinking/feed/ 0
Why Are Some People Noncompliant With Stay-at-Home Orders? https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/05/why-are-some-people-noncompliant-with-stay-at-home-orders/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/05/why-are-some-people-noncompliant-with-stay-at-home-orders/#respond Tue, 19 May 2020 21:13:59 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=24936 Avoidant attachment may drive noncompliance. Avoidant attachment has apparently been increasing in the USA, at least among college students, the presumed cream-of-the-crop of their age group (Konrath et al., 2014). This trend may have something to do with the resistance some have to staying home during the pandemic. Attachment style is learned in early life according to […]]]>

Avoidant attachment may drive noncompliance.

Avoidant attachment has apparently been increasing in the USA, at least among college students, the presumed cream-of-the-crop of their age group (Konrath et al., 2014). This trend may have something to do with the resistance some have to staying home during the pandemic.

Attachment style is learned in early life according to experiences with caregivers.  It is an indicator of social self-regulation. Secure attachment represents the capacity of the individual to enjoy socializing, relate flexibly to others, and resolve conflicts with mutual trust. Secure attachment is a signal that neurobiological structures that undergird these capacities, such as vagal tone (Porges, 2011) and stress response (Lupien et al., 2009), were well shaped by caregiver responsive care — helping the child’s body to calm down after imbalance.

Insecure attachment styles include anxious attachment and avoidant attachment. Like secure attachment, they are measurable types of relational style.

What does avoidant attachment, the focus here, look like?

Those with avoidant attachment have underdeveloped socioemotional intelligence. They have learned to be “in their heads.” They tend to be divorced from feelings of intimacy or vulnerability. They may have learned from caregivers to not pay attention to and even to suppress emotions, or at least awareness of them. They often don’t know themselves very well and don’t get along easily with others.

Adults with avoidant attachment expect independence. After all, that is often what they extensively rehearsed in early family life. (A caveat: typically, attachment assessments done with young children are typically done with mother-child dyads. However, the child may have a different attachment style with another family member, such as father or grandmother. So people likely have mixed styles that vary with the situation.)

What does avoidant attachment negatively affect? Related to stay-at-home order, the avoidant can feel stress from:

  • Staying in a small space with other people
  • Neediness of others; clingy relationships, like a baby and its tremendous 24/7 needs
  • Lack of control over relational dynamics
  • Emotional disclosure

Here are a couple of postures relevant to orders to shelter in place identified by Sharon Martin in her post, What Is an Avoidant Attachment Style and How Can I Change It?:

  • “I need time to myself.” Those who are stuck inside with others, who have young children with them 24/7 instead of going to work and sending children to daycare or preschool, may feel smothered because they are missing “time for themselves.”
  • “I’m not going to change for anyone.” Those who have created a life of independence, relying on feelings of control over their lifestyle, may become angry at having to stop their impulses for freedom and change their behavior.

Secure attachment development is thought to emerge from a mutually responsive relationship with a primary caregiver in early life (Kochanska, 2002). It is longitudinally correlated with compliance, the willingness to do what the caregiver suggests. Those with insecure attachment often resist the rules or suggestions from authority figures.article continues after advertisement

According to Darlene Lancer in her post, How to Change Your Attachment Style: “Unlike those securely attached, pursuers [anxiously attached] and distancers [avoidantly attachment] aren’t skilled at resolving disagreements. They tend to become defensive and attack or withdraw, escalating conflict. Without the chase, conflict, or compulsive behavior, both pursuers and distancers begin to feel depressed and empty due to their painful early attachments.”

Healing from Insecure Attachment

It is important not to shame oneself, nor blame oneself for being a bad person for having the feelings related to insecure attachment. Martin says: “Avoiding intimacy is a coping strategy that developed in infancy. It’s a way to protect yourself from the vulnerability of being hurt or disappointed.” But as adults, we have a responsibility to heal ourselves so we become cooperative citizens when appropriate.

Both Lancer and Martin and good suggestions for how to work at moving toward secure attachment (earned security). Dr. Hal Shorey emphasizes the development of a secure base, a place you can be yourself, either with a therapist or an intimate relationship.

References

Kochanska, G. (2002). Mutually responsive orientation between mothers and their young children: A context for the early development of conscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 191-195.

Konrath, S. H., Chopik, W., Hsing, C., & O’Brien, E. H. (2014). Changes in adult attachment styles in american college students over time: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(4), 326-348. doi: 10.1177/1088868314530516

Lupien, S.J., McEwen, B.S., Gunnar, M.R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434-445.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, self-regulation. New York: W.W. Norton.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/05/why-are-some-people-noncompliant-with-stay-at-home-orders/feed/ 0
Can You Spoil A Baby? https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/04/can-you-spoil-a-baby/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/04/can-you-spoil-a-baby/#respond Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:05:52 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=24598 Don’t worry about “spoiling a baby.” It cannot be done! New parents are often told not to “spoil the baby.” Some people envision “little emperors” demanding their way, with parents running around like servants. How undignified.  True, people who feel entitled are very annoying—they think they are better than the rest of us and deserve […]]]>

Don’t worry about “spoiling a baby.” It cannot be done!

New parents are often told not to “spoil the baby.” Some people envision “little emperors” demanding their way, with parents running around like servants. How undignified. 

True, people who feel entitled are very annoying—they think they are better than the rest of us and deserve special treatment—and throw tantrums when they don’t get the treatment they expect. 

But does the ‘entitled emperor’ analogy aptly apply to a baby? 

It is true that babies expect a lot. They have built in needs for growth that require particular care, represented in the evolved nest (which includes pretty constant touch, as well as rocking). Born 18 months early compared to other animals with only 25% of adult brain volume at full term birth, they need an “external womb” experience to grow properly—millions of synapses a second. They must feel good to grow well—a good biochemistry, rather than a stressed biochemistry—is fundamental to growing brain cell connections (Niehoff, 1999; Stiles, 2008). 

Babies will let you know when they feel something is not right. Traditional societies watch gestures and grimaces for early signals (crying is a very late signal) and move to keep baby happy. Hunter-gatherers are attentive to baby’s state and move in quickly (e.g., Morelli et al., 2013). It is best for caregivers to practice learning baby’s signals early on (skin-to-skin carrying is ideal) and it will get easier and automatic with practice.

To build a resilient body and brain, caregivers need to be ready to provide the support needed. Sensitive periods for growth last until around age six when 90% of brain volume is set to be completed . 

What do relatives mean when they tell parents not to spoil the baby? 

  • “Don’t respond when they signal their needs. Have some grit and harden your heart to their pleas.”

What is it parents are teaching their babies when they do not respond to their cues for help?

  • “Don’t count on me to help you. You are on your own, Bub. Don’t signal your needs—why ever for? In fact, try to ignore your needs. Bury them.” 

The recommendations actually “ruin” baby’s trust. Burying needs and feelings in early life are what people spend years in therapy to uncover and heal. Lack of responsive care is linked to primal wounds, a feeling of basic fault (Balint, 1968).

Remember that babies sleep lightly and wake frequently expecting breastmilk that is designed to keep them regulated and growing optimally (McKenna & Gettler, 2016). Because they are born so immature (18 months early compared to other animals) they need nearly constant touch and physical presence of caregivers (Montagu, 1968; Trevathan, 2011). These are components of our species evolved nest.

Just like infamous John Watson, the behaviorist, it seems as if advisors want babies to be instant grown-ups. Watson, in his 1928 parenting manual, told parents to pretty much ignore their babies so that would learn early not to be annoying college undergraduates. Government pamphlets also emphasized not coddling babies (Blum, 2002). Right, they did not know much at all about child development! They did not know how early life stress is toxic to a child’s developing systems—a burgeoning field of research (e.g., Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000; Shonkoff et al., 2012).

Why are people so impatient with babies?

I attribute it mostly to lack of experience—not growing up around babies, not having many babies in their lives as adults, not perceiving how 2 and 2 fit together—that an undercared for baby leads to an anxious or demanding insecure child and a less-than-optimal adult (sickly, stress reactive, disagreeable, self-centered, rigid).

A lot of western cultural root metaphors for reality also play a role—for example, that humans are machines; people must be controlled to be good; work and productivity are more important than autonomy and unique self-expression (Bowers, 2003). These ideas have been passed down generation to generation with a taboo on tenderness that is common in the USA, along with resentment toward the needy (Suttie, 1938). There is a strain of I didn’t get [xyz], and I’m fine [so why give xyz to this child?]. Or, you shouldn’t have what I didn’t get. The illbeing among American adults steeped in these perspectives is widespread (Metzl, 2019) .

Instead, an ongoing cultural meme is to teach baby “independence” (which also means parent independence from feeling too close to baby’s needs). Teach the baby to have grit—to just bite the bullet and get ready to be obedient to parents’ desires. ‘Life isn’t about wellbeing and happiness, it’s about doing what others tell you to do [starting with me, your parent].  This is a slave mentality, probably built in the parents’ own experience of undercare. “Life is unfair so teach the baby that from the outset.” Like John Watson who urged mothers to treat their babies like college students—make babies get used to undercare now. Unfortunately, it builds in anxiety and a sense of scarcity.

What help do babies need?

In their first 18 months, babies are getting used to living outside the womb without the placenta giving constant support and mom’s biochemistry guiding baby’s development. After birth, babies rely on mom and other caregivers to help them learn to function in all sorts of ways. Every system is guided in its proper development by caregiver support (e.g., positive touch promotes proper respiratory and cardiac function; breastmilk promotes the development of the microbiome which supports a good immune system). Babies are expecting companionship care (the evolved nest). Babies who receive only food and diaper changes fail to thrive (called “hospitalism;” Spitz, 1947).

What happens when you build a house with a faulty foundation? As bilked homebuyers find  out later, the house collapses under stress. If we want our children to be resilient against life’s stresses, we need to support their proper development from the beginning. Humanity’s nest evolved to do just that.

References

Balint, M. (1968). The basic fault: Therapeutic aspects of regression. London: Tavistock Publications.

Blum, D. (2002). Love at Goon Park: Harry Harlow and the Science of Affection. New York: Berkeley Publishing (Penguin).

Bowers, C.A. (2003). Mindful conservatism: Rethinking the ideological and educational basis of an ecologically sustainable future. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.

McKenna, J., & Gettler, L. (2016). There is no such thing as infant sleep, there is no such thing as breastfeeding, there is only breastsleeping. Acta Paediatr, 105(1),17-21. doi: 10.1111/apa.13161

Metz, J.M. (2019). Dying of whiteness. New York: Basic Books.

Montagu, A. (1968). Brains, genes, culture, immaturity, and gestation. In A. Montagu (Ed.), Culture: Man’s adaptive dimension (pp. 102-113). New York: Oxford.

Morelli, G., Ivey Henry, P., & Foerster, S. (2014). Relationships and resource uncertainty:  Cooperative development of Efe hunter-gatherer infants and toddlers. In D. Narvaez, K. Valentino, A. Fuentes, J. McKenna, & P. Gray, Ancestral landscapes in human evolution: Culture, childrearing and social wellbeing (pp. 69-103). New York: Oxford.

Niehoff, D. (1999). The biology of violence: How understanding the brain, behavior, and environment can break the vicious circle of aggression. New York: Free Press.

Shonkoff, J.P. & Phillips, D.A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Research Council, Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Shonkoff, J.P., Garner, A.S. The Committee on Psychosocial Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care, and Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Dobbins,  M.I., Earls, M.F., McGuinn, L., … & Wood, D.L. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129, e232.

Spitz, R. (1947). Grief: A peril in infancy. [film] University Park, PA: Penn State.

Stiles, J.  (2008). The fundamentals of brain development: Integrating nature and nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Suttie, I. (1935). The origins of love and hate. New York, NY: The Julian Press.

Watson, J. B. (1928). Psychological care of infant and child. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

Trevathan, W.R. (2011). Human birth: An evolutionary perspective, 2nd Ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/04/can-you-spoil-a-baby/feed/ 0
International Baby Sleep Research Leads To New Bedsharing Advice https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/01/international-baby-sleep-research-leads-to-new-bedsharing-advice/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/01/international-baby-sleep-research-leads-to-new-bedsharing-advice/#comments Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:16:46 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=23738 Research by Durham University’s baby sleep experts has led to new international guidance on bedsharing. In the new protocol, breastfeeding mothers and babies are not advised against bedsharing, as long as no dangerous circumstances exist. This marks a departure from advice most commonly given which categorically advises against bedsharing. The new clinical guidance has been […]]]>

Research by Durham University’s baby sleep experts has led to new international guidance on bedsharing.

In the new protocol, breastfeeding mothers and babies are not advised against bedsharing, as long as no dangerous circumstances exist. This marks a departure from advice most commonly given which categorically advises against bedsharing.

The new clinical guidance has been heavily informed by research from our Durham Infancy & Sleep Centre.

Safe bedsharing

The protocol has been published by the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, an international body of physicians, and is aimed at clinicians world-wide.

It emphasises that all parents should be educated on safe bedsharing, with the understanding that bedsharing is very common.

Dangerous circumstances include sleeping with an adult on a sofa or armchair; sleeping next to an adult impaired by alcohol, medications, or illicit drugs; tobacco exposure; and preterm birth.

Keeping babies safe

Our Durham Infancy & Sleep Centre has been at the forefront of infant sleep research for over 20 years. It has made a significant contribution to keeping babies safe at night, including helping to reduce the rates of Suddent Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).

Our researchers conduct studies in people’s homes, in hospitals and in our own sleep lab on campus where parents and babies can be observed during the night with cameras and via breathing, heart rate and temperature monitors.

Evidence from our research shows that breastfed babies, who share the bed with their mothers, sleep on their backs, and are naturally positioned away from pillows and things that may obstruct their airways. Breastfeeding mothers instinctively form a protective position around their baby.

The bedroom that helps parents and babies to sleep better… The research by the Parent-Infant Sleep Lab has helped to shape the way babies sleep and how parents care for them at night-time.

Find out more

See the press release here.

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2020/01/international-baby-sleep-research-leads-to-new-bedsharing-advice/feed/ 2
The Forever Gift https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/11/the-forever-gift/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/11/the-forever-gift/#respond Sun, 10 Nov 2019 19:24:59 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=22924 Whether or not children learn to read impacts their lives forever. Even though non-reading adults can and do learn to read, learning to read as an adult can never give back a childhood shaped by the joys of reading. I learned to read as a child even though I wasn’t read to until I was […]]]>

Whether or not children learn to read impacts their lives forever. Even though non-reading adults can and do learn to read, learning to read as an adult can never give back a childhood shaped by the joys of reading. I learned to read as a child even though I wasn’t read to until I was in third grade. Every day I lived for that story chapter book our teacher would read to us (if we were good). The first children’s books I owned were the ones I bought for my own children. It will take the rest of my life to read a fraction of the children’s books I missed, but I’m making steady progress, thanks to the Book Fairy.

The books children hear and the books children read become part of their childhood for the rest of their lives. Having books in their homes from the beginning shapes their lives in ways that nothing else does. When a friend asked the topic of my next article, she instantly recalled, “Our cousins gave us their Nancy Drew books and even though those books were above my reading level, I was determined to read them because I just had to solve those mysteries.

No matter which holidays we celebrate, if gift giving is part of the celebration, I can think of no more meaningful gifts to give to the children in our lives than ones that support and promote reading. I think the reason that books are often overlooked as special gifts for children is because the “wow” factor doesn’t usually show itself until the book is read, unless it is the highly anticipated new book in a favorite series.

Eighteen years ago, when my granddaughter was five, I gave her a Walkman cassette player for Christmas. The batteries were installed and an audiobook was already in place. She immediately put on her headphones, pushed play and she was gone! She was so captivated by the story (only she was hearing) that she was reluctant to stop it long enough to open the rest of her gifts. To this day it remains a family favorite. My gift to you is that I’m going to share the title of that magical book, just in case you would love to delight a child you love with it. The book is Wolf Story, by William McCleary. It was first published in 1947, but was out of print for many years. Thankfully, it was reissued in 2012.

Since Wolf Story is only eighty-eight pages, it is a chapter book you will likely finish in one reading because your children will keep begging you for one more chapter and you will be loving it so much that you will keep saying yes! Now that is my idea of a wow factor!

 

Reading aloud to the children we love is about more than literacy. Reading aloud together is one of the most powerful ways there is to connect with children of all ages. If we stop reading to children once they can read on their own, we will miss an amazing opportunity to learn together, to share laughter and tears and to stay connected through the years through the books we share. There is no shortage of great read alouds for middle graders. My absolute favorite books for 10 to 14 year old girls or boys, are written by Michael Morpurgo. He’s written over 100, so that should keep you in books to read together until high school.

Check out the Book Fairy Pantry Project, founded by Pam Leo!

 

When we give books to children the message they hear is, books are important, reading is important and you are important. Whether we give them special books or audiobooks, a magazine subscription or a gift certificate to a bookstore, we give them the forever gift of reading.

“Books change children’s lives… for good.”- Pam Leo

It is my honor to announce that Book Fairy Pantry Project will soon be receiving a fabulous donation from Amanda Panda Music. For every two of her new, I Am Peaceful Coloring Songbooks purchased, she will donate one copy to BFPP to gift to children in foster care in Maine. Learn how you can support our effort to help ALL children to help themselves to feel more peaceful at amandapandamusic.com.

 

Photo by Shutterstock/Evgeny Atamanenko

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/11/the-forever-gift/feed/ 0
Inner Child Journeys: How Our Children Grow Us Up – Foreword by Ray Castellino https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/inner-child-journeys-how-our-children-grow-us-up-foreward-by-ray-castellino-phd/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/inner-child-journeys-how-our-children-grow-us-up-foreward-by-ray-castellino-phd/#respond Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:19:11 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=22883 SUBSCRIBE For Email Marketing you can trust. Below is the Foreword to Robin Grille’s new book, Inner Child Journeys: How Our Children Grow Us Up, written by Ray Castellino. Above is the illustration by artist John Cooper, UK, for the cover of Inner Child Journeys. Robin Grille came into my life in September of 2016 […]]]>

SUBSCRIBE

Below is the Foreword to Robin Grille’s new book, Inner Child Journeys: How Our Children Grow Us Up, written by Ray Castellino.

Above is the illustration by artist John Cooper, UK, for the cover of Inner Child Journeys.


Robin Grille came into my life in September of 2016 in Findhorn, Scotland. He and I had the privilege of speaking at the same conference. This offered us the opportunity to get to know each other while hanging out in the cool evening Findhorn air. I knew immediately that, with Robin, I have a brother in kind. Robin is the real deal! He’s as authentic as they come. He’s passionate, personable, wonderfully skilled and exquisitely articulate.

Today, as I’m writing this, I’m also experiencing my 74th birthday. I’m in my third read of Robin’s new book, Inner Child Journeys: How Our Children Grow Us Up.

Purchase your own copy of Robin Grille’s new book by clicking on the image!

This book is more than another parenting book by another expert. This is Robin personally and eloquently guiding us through an introspective process in order to know ourselves better, heal old wounds and expand our ability to intuit and to give and receive love. Robin’s wisdom is this: if we do indeed come to know the depths of ourselves, we are empowered to create deeper connections with others. As parents, grandparents, professional caregivers and teachers, we increase our capacity to support the flourishing of our children.

In the 1970s for 5 years, I was a single dad raising my young son. I was fortunate to have excellent counseling and a group of like-minded parents to help me become the kind of father that could truly learn from his son. When I first began reading Robin’s Inner Child Journeys, I  thought about how much I could have used this book back then! Robin, where were you in the early 1970s? This is not to diminish the value of this book today; and how it has helped me as a grandfather in my relationships with my adult children, grandson and life partner.

You see, this is not a book to just read; it is an interactive process. It is a stimulant for deep reflection, loaded with illustrative stories and helpful exercises. More than reading; you find yourself stirred to the most visceral feelings, while at the same time savoring the many insights, the bursting ‘ahas’. Robin guides us through wisely designed exercises that support us to integrate the most challenging imprints from our distant past and to find a way forward, relieved and renewed.

As you enter these pages you will find yourself led by an expert and articulate thinker, philosopher, professional therapist, writer, husband, father – a deeply feeling human being. Robin does not leave himself out of the writing. He includes himself in intimate, contemplative and uplifting ways. Many of the examples that he offers are from his own life and his own struggles. His candid self-disclosure creates an alchemy that helps alleviate my own harsh inner critic. My sense of aloneness and isolation dissipates as I move into the realization that our most core experiences are actually shared.

Through Robin’s transparency, I feel him there with me as I journey through the exercises. I’m not alone on the journey. Furthermore, Robin shows us how to share our inner journeys with our loved ones and friends, and with like-minded folks who can gather in supportive groups.

A consistent theme throughout Robin’s work is that by coming to appreciate how we came into this life and grew up, we grow in our compassion for ourselves and each other, especially our loved ones and our children. There is no question that my children are and have been among my greatest teachers. Children are programmed to bring us great joy; but at the same time they are capable of provoking the darker depths of our being. By design, our children will often touch us in those regions of our consciousness that we least want to look at.

My kids have done their jobs well; our interactions have often forced me to have to look into myself. So many times, especially when I was a single dad with my firstborn, I would be triggered into anger. I had clung to the idealistic belief that I would never ever find myself treating my own children as I had been treated as a child. I never wanted to rage, especially not at them! Yet, there I was, as a parent, wrestling with the forces of raw, early childhood rage that had remained inside me from before I could talk. What to do with all this anger?

I remember such a day when my son was barely 4 years old. I felt totally unable to reach him, to connect with him. Although I was knee-deep in helplessness and frustration, I remember looking at him and feeling that somehow, in some miraculous way, we were going to get through this. Somehow I had a flash that my son was doing an amazing job of communicating how he was feeling. He and I were raging at the same time, together. I realized that we both knew how the other was feeling. What my son had brought back to me, in an instant, was the distinct memory of what it felt like to be a little boy, out of control with unspeakable anger.  It was at that moment that I learned my young son and I could be on the same side of the fence; with each other rather than in destructive opposition to each other. Instead of trying to get him to “behave” and connect with me, I saw then what he was communicating through his behavior and the raw energy of his emotion. I got it!  As soon as this ‘ah-ha’ hit me; I was calm. It was as if I had been given a new set of eyes, a new way to listen, and a new way to feel and be with my son. This was a parenting game-changer for me; to understand my child from the inside, through the senses of my own Inner Child. This new perspective  transformed me as a parent. The guidance Robin gives us lines us up for many such inspired realizations, and the deeper connections with our children that these new perceptions bring.

Discover the psycho-social-emotional history of parenting in Robin’s seminal book.

In Part A, Robin lucidly shares neuro-scientific research that sheds light on why the emotions and sensations of childhood, from the dawn of life onward, can so readily be triggered to resurface. In the most accessible terms, he introduces us to the neurobiological underpinnings of human empathy, explaining how we affect each other so profoundly; why we humans seem so irrevocably intertwined. We are wired to have our own internal template for what others are experiencing and feeling. The feelings of helplessness and rage that my son had triggered in me, for instance, were a window into myself; showing me when and how I had once felt exactly as he was feeling –  we were deeply connected to one another.

With Inner Child Journeys, Robin has helped me to better understand myself and my children at the same time, assisting me to become more conscious, mindful and present; with myself and with my loved ones. This introspective method provides a vessel in which we can differentiate  feelings that arise from our past from feelings that make sense in the present context, to recognize when we have been triggered and to distinguish our projections from our children’s real needs. These gains in self-awareness enable us to choose more wisely how to respond to our children.

I found Robin’s anecdotes particularly inspiring. The stories  feel close-to-home; the  challenges they depict involving family or classroom dynamics have a poignantly familiar ring. We are brought home to the most universal agonies and triumphs of human growth and transformation. These real-life tales do what a didactic explanation cannot: they make the rich and complex psychological concepts come alive, in crispy clarity and full color. Swinging back and forth between anecdotes and exercises, Robin creates a rhythm between them: the anecdotes give me inspiration while the exercises give me the opportunity to pause, look inward and feel. I experienced this rhythm in the narrative like a pendulum; moving me through my own inner world in a slow and gradual integrative cadence. Robin’s pace is gentle, always prioritizing our emotional safety, so we don’t have to take-in our own childhood story in big unmanageable chunks. We are reminded to pause, take our time and to modulate our passage through the Journey.

So far, I’ve been mostly writing as a parent and grandparent; but I have also found Robin’s Inner Child Journeys equally useful as a professional who works with families, adults and trains other professionals. Whether we are physicians, nurses, psychologists, body-oriented somatic therapists or teachers, so much of our training emphasizes the primacy of an empathic rapport with our clients: the people we are treating, counseling or instructing. Robin advocates for the need to cultivate self-knowledge; before we can properly understand others. Only when we can tap into our own historic joys and sufferings; can we achieve our fullest potential for compassion, intuition and the ability to support and guide others.

I remember being a music teacher in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s in an upper/middle-class white, suburban community seventh and eighth grade junior high school with students in the range of 12 and 13 years of age. I was young and very idealistic. I had the hope of contributing to the transformation of what was then a very demanding, teacher-centered junior high school; into a truly student-centered educational system. Beside myself there were a few other colleagues – the art teacher and the Spanish teacher – who valued student-centered learning. This was in a school that still in 1970 adhered to occasional corporal punishment. The wood-crafted paddle on the wall in the principal’s office hung as a reminder for students to behave rather than connect. I would have so loved to have a copy of the Inner Child Journeys book in those days. My like-minded colleagues and I knew and appreciated each other, but we needed more guidance on how we might be able to truly support one another. I am deeply moved by Robin’s description of an Australian high school where the faculty are committed to understanding their own Inner Child processes, and where the teachers are encouraged to explore their own psychological roots of the challenges and impasses they face daily with their students. I am so heartened by the synergy and mutual support and cooperation that story presents between the teachers, as well as between the teachers and students. Even more heartening is the fact that this type of guidance is ever more available today for teachers around the world.

Robin’s Inner Child Journeys is full of wonderful, enlightening wisdom that I remain excited  to share with my family, loved ones, my clients, colleagues and students.

I firmly believe that the more of us that take Robin’s invitation into our own Inner Child Journeys, the better parents, grandparents and professionals we collectively become.

I want to see this book in the hands of all the people I am fortunate to work with:  clients, families and students of all ages and walks of life. Inner Child Journeys is a must read for all of us, parents, grandparents, teachers and health professionals.

Thank you Robin for giving us such strong, well-constructed and passionate guidance to journey into the emotionally rich wisdom-filled realms of our Inner Child.

Ray Castellino, DC

Respectfully,

Ray Castellino

Ojai, CA

July 11, 2018

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/inner-child-journeys-how-our-children-grow-us-up-foreward-by-ray-castellino-phd/feed/ 0
Parents’ Behavior Influences Bonding Hormone Oxytocin In Babies: New Study https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/parents-behavior-influences-bonding-hormone-oxytocin-in-babies-new-study/ https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/parents-behavior-influences-bonding-hormone-oxytocin-in-babies-new-study/#respond Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:32:55 +0000 http://www.kindredmedia.org/?p=22867 A new epigenetic study suggests that mothers’ behavior can also have a substantial impact on their children’s developing oxytocin systems Oxytocin is an extremely important hormone, involved in social interaction and bonding in mammals, including humans. It’s well known that a new mother’s oxytocin levels can influence her behavior and as a result, the bond […]]]>

A new epigenetic study suggests that mothers’ behavior can also have a substantial impact on their children’s developing oxytocin systems

Oxytocin is an extremely important hormone, involved in social interaction and bonding in mammals, including humans. It’s well known that a new mother’s oxytocin levels can influence her behavior and as a result, the bond she makes with her baby. A new epigenetic study by Kathleen Krol and Jessica Connelly from the University of Virginia and Tobias Grossmann from the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences now suggests that mothers’ or fathers’ behavior can also have a substantial impact on their children’s developing oxytocin systems.

Childhood marks a dynamic and malleable phase of postnatal development. Many bodily systems are coming online, maturing, or getting tweaked, often setting our psychological and behavioral trajectories well into adulthood. Nature plays an obvious role, shaping us through our genes. But we are also heavily influenced by our interactions, with other people and with our environment. “It is well known that oxytocin is actively involved in early social, perceptual, and cognitive processes, and, that it influences complex social behaviors,” says Tobias Grossmann. “However, in this study we ask whether the mother’s behavior might also have a decisive influence on the development of the baby’s oxytocin system itself. Advances in molecular biology, epigenetics in particular, have recently made it possible to investigate the interaction of nature and nurture, in this case infant care, in fine detail. That is exactly what we’ve done here”.

The scientists observed a free play interaction between mothers and their five-month-old children. “We collected saliva samples from both the mother and the infant during the visit and then a year later, when the child was 18 months old. We were interested in exploring whether the involvement of the mother, in the original play session, would have an influence on the oxytocin receptor gene of the child, a year later. The oxytocin receptor is essential for the hormone oxytocin to exert its effects and the gene can determine how many are produced,” explains Kathleen Krol, a Hartwell postdoctoral fellow in Connelly’s Lab at the University of Virginia who conducted the study together with Tobias Grossmann at MPI CBS in Leipzig.

“We found that epigenetic changes had occurred in infant’s DNA, and that this change was predicted by the quality of the mother’s involvement in the play session. If mothers were particularly involved in the game with their children, there was a greater reduction in DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene one year later. Decreased DNA methylation in this region has previously been associated with increased expression of the oxytocin receptor gene. Thus, greater maternal involvement seems to have the potential to upregulate the oxytocin system in human offspring,” explains the scientist. “Importantly, we also found that the DNA methylation levels reflected infant temperament, which was reported to us by the parents. The children with higher methylation levels at 18-months, and presumably lower levels of oxytocin receptor, were also more temperamental and less well balanced.”

The results of this study provide a striking example of how we are not simply bound by our genes but are rather the products of a delicate interplay between our blue prints and experiences. Early social interaction with our caregivers, certainly including fathers, can influence our biological and psychological development through epigenetic changes to the oxytocin system. These and related findings highlight the importance of parenting in promoting cross-generational health.

###

Original publication

Kathleen M. Krol, Robert G. Moulder, Travis S. Lillard, Tobias Grossmann, Jessica J. Connelly “Epigenetic dynamics in infancy and the impact of maternal engagement” Science Advances 16 Oct 2019: Vol. 5, no. 10, eaay0680 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay0680

 

]]>
https://www.kindredmedia.org/2019/10/parents-behavior-influences-bonding-hormone-oxytocin-in-babies-new-study/feed/ 0